Communicating Up, Down and Across the Organization

I have been preaching that you have to stay close to your CEO, communicate daily with him/her as well as have daily meetings. I am sure I do not need to tell you that it is equally important that you are able to communicate across the organization to be effective.

If you are a good communicator you should be able to portray a high level of self-confidence, self-concept, and project a positive external image to the managers you support up, down, and across the organization. There are ways to do this and the best way is to make sure you have established  trust and credibility. If you have these two(2) key elements you will have stronger working relationships with those that you support. These key elements are the foundation of your level of effectiveness in your organization.

If you have these two(2) building blocks you then need to make sure you are an effective influencer,that you provide a clear and direct image and knowledge base. You need to make sure you have targeted your audience and built a message that is clear and concise that people understand and not mistake or feel it is HR speak. If you can do this you will reap beneficial results for your project/program/initiative or whatever. This will also flow though to your subordinates.

I hope that this short message on communication is helpful especially to the mid-level HR manager, director. For those at the top, the CHRO, CPO you should already know this.

Changing Jobs in a Recession

With the stock markets down again this week, more bankruptcies, and layoffs happening across industries, a rewarding job that provides a steady source of income is your best friend. So why would someone even consider moving jobs in this economy? CIO Magazine investigated and came to the conclusion that conventional wisdom be damned, changing jobs during a downturn can actually be a good idea.

Their rationale? Companies tend to hire more for "critical" positions during a downturn, since every opening is scrutinized more carefully. Basically, the roles that are being filled are ones that offer the potential to both make a huge impact and advance your career. Firms that are recruiting in a downturn are doing so because the roles they have to fill have a major importance to their organizations

They also point out that staying put during a recession can create a bad perception of you at your current company. Whether or not you agree with their take, it certainly makes compelling reading.

CIO On-Line has this to offer in relation to this post by Meredith Levinson:

Is It a Good Idea to Change Jobs During a Recession?

Conventional wisdom says that an economic downturn is not a good time to change jobs and that employed professionals should just hunker down in their current positions and try to prevent getting laid off. But staying put could potentially do more harm to your career than pursuing a new opportunity. And a new opportunity could be your ticket to stability and economic prosperity.

Conventional wisdom says that a recession or economic downturn is not a good time to change jobs. During a recession, most employed professionals hunker down and try to prevent getting laid off. Who can blame them?


But a recession can be an excellent time to take a new job, provided you've done your due diligence, says Sam Gordon, a recruiter with Harvey Nash Executive Search. "Firms that are recruiting in a downturn are doing so because the roles they have to fill have a major importance to their organizations," he says.

Such strategic roles are unlikely to be cut if a company has committed to investing in them in spite of a downturn. These positions also present opportunities for professionals to progress in their careers instead of stagnating in their existing roles while riding out a recession, says Gordon (who's not just trying to drum up by talking up the value of taking a new job.) He adds that companies that continue to fill key positions and invest in strategic projects tend to be more innovative and dynamic--and are better prepared to capitalize on an economic rebound--than companies that unilaterally pull back their spending when the going gets tough.

"If you look back on the last downturn, the dot com crash, there were lots of firms that had cut back their investment, and when they needed to grow again, they had a much bigger ramp up than companies that continued to invest," he says.

What's more, staying put during a recession could potentially do more harm to your career than good. You might think that hunkering down, taking on extra projects and working longer hours will put you in a position to be promoted when the economy rebounds, but, says Gordon, that's not often the case. Lots of companies take advantage of employees who fear layoffs and who work extra hard to keep their jobs, he says.


"Quite often, the person who has proven himself to be amenable and willing to do extra things can get himself into a hole," says Gordon. "The perception of you as someone who always acquiesces to demands can be hard to shake. When the good times come back and there's a new, exciting project, very often the company will still go externally to find the person they're looking for."

So really, your only reward for redoubling your efforts is keeping your current job, and even that's no guarantee in this economy.

What's your strategy for surviving the recession? Are you going to "stay low and keep moving" in your current position, or are you going to look for something new? If you lay low have to totally recession proofed your job. Please refer to an earlier post on this issue.

As always your comments and opinions are important and I'd like to hear from you.