Showing posts with label back to basics leadership. Show all posts
Showing posts with label back to basics leadership. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 26, 2014

Leadership - Innovation...What Matters Most

WHY LEADERS FIND INNOVATION CHALLENGING

Innovation challenges "current ways" that are not necessarily "Black Swans," per se, but rather a normal course of commerce in an instantaneous information-filled business world. In many respects, determining the priorities of change and executing to value are a CEO's greatest leadership challenge. And, for Boards who are charged with the responsibility of evaluating their company's CEO's progress and performance, it remains their most important duty.

We asked many of our clients why product and process innovations prove difficult.  It boils down to a leader's balance, and courage.

Knowing that innovation is disruptive to business models, organizational structure, and a company's traditional culture (note that Peter Drucker once pointed out that culture triumphs strategy any day), many CEOs, on balance, believe that change may be too disruptive, "career risky," and regardless, may not be achievable during their stewardship. And therefore many CEOs "play it safe." Yet, as challenging as it is to pivot with the velocity of change ever accelerating, "playing it safe" or not gaining first advantage rarely results in maintaining or moving toward a market-leading position.

Courageous leaders recognize this risk and opportunity cost of inaction. They seek to innovate and execute, and don't hesitate to reinvent their business proposition to sustain and/or extend their disruptive advantage. These leaders recognize that the actions undertaken, i.e. disruptive risk, is all things considered a superior alternative to becoming a laggard, requiring future triage to catch up and remain relevant.

Sometimes tune-ups are mislabeled as innovations, for example improving customer care, while true innovation requires a significantly different path, of broader dimensions, to accelerate enterprise opportunity. Be careful to know which is which, and why.

THE WINNING HAND IS TALENT

Leading innovation to tangible value is a difficult undertaking, and a truly "sensitive matter" fraught with complexities. It requires a clear vision, commitment, and flexibility. It must be planned carefully, resourced, and executed with care, taking into account unintended consequences will likely pop up.

The most successful CEOs recognize that talent wins out, most especially in times of significant adjustments. And the CEOs interest (and yes, professional preservation) in carefully attracting and evaluating the best talent for his/her inner circle is job one. Talent is their "secret sauce" necessary to shape and guide the economic future of their enterprise, not just to react to it.

Without a team of exceptional leaders guiding and "owning" change, transformation will fall short.

Forward thinking CEOs continually evaluate whether they have their best players in the most impactful roles. They view the recruitment of key executives as an ongoing responsibility, realizing that they oftentimes don't have the time to develop internally the special skilled talent that they need now.

THE BOTTOM LINE

We live in a world of two truisms: a rapidly reforming world, and CEO accountability to enhance value, taking into account the opportunities and obstacle, foreseen or not. And with the realities of short term measurements and "Black Swans," attracting and investing in exceptional, and oftentimes rare, executive talent is an investment that pays off. In most cases, the best teams claim the most wins.


It's what shareholders expect, and activists demand.

Thursday, January 19, 2012

10 Best Companies for Leaders: How Focusing on Leadership Development Creates a Competitive Advantage

January 18 2012 by ChiefExecutive.net


Cover



Chief Executive names 2012′s Best Companies for Leaders

Since 2005, Chief Executive and Chally Group Worldwide have been releasing the “Best Companies for Leaders,” a list of corporations who lead the pack when it comes to leadership development. These companies generate significant market share, make leadership development a high priority despite time and financial pressures, and their executives spend more personal time mentoring leaders. This year’s top company is Procter & Gamble, led by CEO Bob McDonald.
The Top 10 Best Companies for Leaders are:
  1. Procter & Gamble, Robert McDonald
  2. IBM, Virginia Rometty
  3. General Electric, Jeffrey R. Immelt
  4. 3M, George Buckley
  5. Southwest Airlines, Gary C. Kelly
  6. ADP, Carlos A. Rodriguez
  7. PepsiCo, Indra Nooyi
  8. Cardinal Health, George S. Barnett
  9. Caterpillar, Douglas R. Oberhelman
  10. Discovery Communications, David M. Zaslav

Tuesday, October 11, 2011

Leadership, After All


The noted artist Willem De Kooning, as he aged, commented that, "you have to change to stay the same." Sometimes, as leaders, we find wisdom in rediscovering what we already know.
Having met with numerous Board members and corporate leaders recently, many seem to be off put off by the loss of control over many of the circumstances that previously could be “managed”. Many are questioning whether the old standards still apply.
We were struck by the following insight.

Recently, we asked several CEOs about future commitments, i.e. just how far forward they feel comfortable in predicting outcomes. The answer from most was one quarter... three months... astoundingly short given that when we asked this same question a few years ago, the answer was, on average, four quarters.

This suggests that in a time of uncertainty, in spite of the strength of current quarterly results, whether the light at the end of the tunnel is recovery or an out of control train speeding in our direction?
And, that it is very easy for CEOs and their boards to resist the falderal of the moment and be more easily influenced by the herd.
Our experience suggests that the most successful leaders actually embrace uncertainty. They see it as an opportunity for a re-commitment to the building blocks of excellence. As one notable CEO said to us, “the basics always win out.”
We know that ethical corporate cultures win out. We know that deep dive rigor and commitment to operational excellence, wins out. And we know that well disciplined and effective corporate governance is a huge plus in dealing with the unknown. All of this takes work and extraordinary discipline, especially today with daily fluxes and contrary information that impact how businesses do business.
The best leaders, we have observed, don’t become unbalanced by conditions that they can’t shape.  They know their troops are observing whether they are being led with calm and confidence.
However, “back to basics” doesn’t mean that leaders should stick their heads in the sand. Rather, it means stressing the “known” while being flexible to address matters beyond a leader’s control.
Today, though, there is a tendency to try and outsmart current conditions hoping to gain advantage. Many CEO’s have a fear of being left behind, and being criticized by their boards for not being more proactive. It is impossible to “map” uncertainty.
So, here's our prescription for CEOs and Directors.

Because you can't control the unpredictable, rely on what you know... that means drill deep in your business…then dig deeper.
Don’t outsmart yourself or believe that you can outsmart the markets.
For Directors, demand transparency of your CEO and be prepared to invest extraordinary time to fully comprehend the various levers of your company's value… know the how and when.
For CEOs, demand deep dive information and dig in yourself. Set the pace of expectations. Demand excellence.  Redouble your effort to communicate to all “stakeholders.” Be clear about issues, challenges and opportunities with your board and your senior team.
Be consistent, focused and relentless. Isn’t that what leadership is all about?
By Joel Koblentz on October 11, 2011, Managing Partner of the Koblenz Group